Notebookcheck

Ноутбук Eurocom Sky X4C (i9-9900KS, RTX2080). Краткий обзор от Notebookcheck

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (перевод Антона Авдюшкина), 29/11/2019

127-ваттный Intel Core i9. Выпущенное три года назад шасси Clevo P751DM2 начинает неизбежно устаревать. Этот корпус сумел обуздать настольный процессор Intel Core i9 с разблокированным множителем, но обеспечить его стабильную работу на высоких частотах без нагрева выше 90 °C не удалось.

Это сокращенная версия обзора. Вы можете прочитать полный обзор на английском языке здесь

Хорошо (85%) Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop) Gaming - 28/11/2019 - v7
Тестовый образец выдан нам компанией Eurocom
Сохранить защищённую авторским правом картинку с итоговым рейтингом в формате PNG / SVG
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS (Sky Серия)
Процессор
Графический адаптер
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop) - 8192 Мбайт, Ядро: 1380 МГц, Память: 1750 МГц, GDDR6, 441.2
Оперативная память
32768 Мбайт 
, DDR4-3003, Corsair, 16-18-18-39, dual-channel, 4x SODIMM slots
Дисплей
15.6 дюйм. 16:9, 1920 x 1080 пикс. 141 точек/дюйм, AU Optronics B156HAN07.0, IPS, AUO70ED, глянцевое покрытие: ✕
Материнская плата
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Хранение данных
Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB, 512 Гбайт 
,
Звуковая плата
NVIDIA TU104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Интерфейсы
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen 1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 слот замка Kensington, Аудиоразъёмы: 2-in-1 Audio Jack (Headphone, S/PDIF); Microphone-in; Line-out; Line-in, картридер: SD
Коммуникации
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Габариты
высота х ширина х глубина (мм): 38 x 386 x 262
Аккумулятор
82 Вт⋅ч литий-ион., с возможностью замены, 14.8V
Операционная система
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Камера
Фронтальная камера: 2 MP (FHD)
Дополнительно
акустическая система: 2 W stereo, клавиатура: Beveled, подсветка клавиатуры: ✔, Control Center 2.0, 12 мес. гарантии в Европе
Вес
3.55 Кг, адаптер питания: 1.42 Кг
Стоимость
3800 USD
Внимание: Разные образцы одной и той же модели часто используют неодинаковые компоненты! (Матрица AUO вместо BOE, память Hynix вместо Samsung, накопитель SATA вместо PCIe, ...)

 

РейтингДатаМодельВесВысотаРазмерРазрешениеНизкая цена
85%11/2019Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
3.6 Кг38 мм15.6"1920x1080
87%07/2018MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
8750H, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
2.9 Кг40 мм15.6"1920x1080
86%05/2019MSI GE75 9SG
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
2.7 Кг27.5 мм17.3"1920x1080
88%03/2019Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
4.3 Кг41 мм17.3"1920x1080
86%03/2019Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
3.9 Кг42 мм17.3"1920x1080
402.6 mm 319.2 mm 42 mm 3.9 kg390 mm 266 mm 40 mm 2.9 kg386 mm 262 mm 38 mm 3.6 kg383 mm 260 mm 27.5 mm 2.4 kg362 mm 265 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 275 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg
(Source: Eurocom)
(Source: Eurocom)
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
193.9 MB/s ∼100%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181.3 MB/s ∼94% -6%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
178 MB/s ∼92% -8%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
149 MB/s ∼77% -23%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
11.67 MB/s ∼6% -94%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
201.96 MB/s ∼100%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s ∼98% -2%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
192.5 MB/s ∼95% -5%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
13.44 MB/s ∼7% -93%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1291 (min: 1212, max: 1379) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
685 MBit/s ∼53%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
640 (min: 541, max: 677) MBit/s ∼50%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
633 MBit/s ∼49%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
615 (min: 508, max: 642) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1374 (min: 720, max: 1484) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
629 (min: 602, max: 651) MBit/s ∼46%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
580 (min: 497, max: 619) MBit/s ∼42%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
570 MBit/s ∼41%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
540 MBit/s ∼39%
284.1
cd/m²
285.5
cd/m²
254.2
cd/m²
259.9
cd/m²
258.8
cd/m²
237.5
cd/m²
261.9
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
233.4
cd/m²
Равномерность подсветки экрана
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Максимум: 285.5 cd/m² В среднем: 258.5 cd/m² Minimum: 11.89 cd/m²
Равномерность подсветки: 82 %
От батареи: 258.8 cd/m²
Контрастность: 924:1 (Уровень чёрного: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.45 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 3
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
90.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 58.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
BOE NV156FHM-N4J, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
N156HHE-GA1, TN, 15.6, 1920x1080
Eurocom Sky X4C
ID: SHP142A, Name: LQ156D1JX01B, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Response Times
38%
14%
-3%
48%
-154%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
43%
15 (8, 7)
11%
19 (9, 10)
-13%
8.4 (4.4, 4)
50%
33.6 (19.6, 14)
-100%
Response Time Black / White *
10.8 (5.2, 5.6)
7.2 (5, 2.2)
33%
9 (5, 4)
17%
10 (6, 4)
7%
5.8 (4.4, 1.4)
46%
33.2 (21.2, 12)
-207%
PWM Frequency
26000 (25)
250 (20)
25510 (34)
1000 (20)
Параметры экрана
22%
7%
44%
18%
11%
Яркость в центре
258.8
285
10%
309
19%
477
84%
307.1
19%
324.7
25%
Brightness
258
273
6%
284
10%
431
67%
276
7%
318
23%
Brightness Distribution
82
84
2%
88
7%
84
2%
80
-2%
81
-1%
Уровень чёрного *
0.28
0.23
18%
0.42
-50%
0.175
37%
0.37
-32%
0.26
7%
Контрастность
924
1239
34%
736
-20%
2726
195%
830
-10%
1249
35%
Colorchecker DeltaE *
4.45
3.52
21%
3.99
10%
4.17
6%
2.53
43%
4.67
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.85
5.18
47%
8.3
16%
6.97
29%
4.66
53%
8.16
17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3
1.12
63%
2.51
16%
2.82
6%
DeltaE для серого *
5.8
3.41
41%
5.43
6%
3.49
40%
1.7
71%
5.9
-2%
Гамма
2.36 93%
2.05 107%
2.57 86%
2.5 88%
2.194 100%
2.14 103%
CCT
7651 85%
7077 92%
7767 84%
7076 92%
6893 94%
7176 91%
Покрытие спектра AdobeRGB, %
58.8
77
31%
63
7%
60
2%
76
29%
61.1
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90.5
100
10%
97
7%
91
1%
100
10%
96.1
6%
Среднее значение
30% / 25%
11% / 8%
21% / 36%
33% / 22%
-72% / -17%

* ... меньше = лучше

Дисплей: тест на время отклика

Время отклика показывает, как быстро дисплей устройства способен сменить цвет изображения с одного на другой. Недостаточно быстрый отклик может привести к деформации подвижных фрагментов изображения, появлении теней и размытости. Отсутствие таких проблем особенно важно для просмотра фильмов и для игр.
       Перемена цвета пикселей, чёрный - белый (1) и белый - чёрный (2)
10.8 ms ... стадия 1 ↗ и стадия 2 ↘ в сумме↗ 5.2 ms стадия 1
↘ 5.6 ms стадия 2
Это неплохое время отклика. Оно подходит для игр и подобных применений, хоть и не идеально.
Для сравнения, самый лучший результат среди всех известных нам устройств равен 0.8 миллисек., самый худший - 240 миллисек. » 10% экранов из нашей базы данных показали более хороший результат.
Таким образом, тестируемое устройство находится в верхней половине рейтинга (оно опережает средний результат, равный 24.8 миллисек.)
       Перемена цвета пикселей, серый 50% - серый 80% (1) и серый 80% - серый 50% (2)
16.8 ms ... стадия 1 ↗ и стадия 2 ↘ в сумме↗ 9.2 ms стадия 1
↘ 7.6 ms стадия 2
Это неплохое время отклика. Оно подходит для игр и подобных применений, хоть и не идеально.
Для сравнения, самый лучший результат среди всех известных нам устройств равен 0.9 миллисек., самый худший - 636 миллисек. » 11% экранов из нашей базы данных показали более хороший результат.
Таким образом, тестируемое устройство находится в верхней половине рейтинга (оно опережает средний результат, равный 39.5 миллисек.)

Тест на мерцание

Некоторые устройства устанавливают яркость экрана при помощи быстрого включения-выключения светодиодов вместо простого понижения напряжения их питания. Такой метод обозначается аббревиатурой ШИМ (или PWM). Он часто приводит к полоскам или ряби на изображении, а также к быстрой усталости глаз и головной боли. Мы проверяем, используется ли PWM в тестируемом устройстве, и если да, то при каких условиях.
Ура! ШИМ не обнаружено

Для сравнения, 51 % известных нам устройств не применяют PWM для изменения яркости, а среди тех, где PWM используется, типичная частота модуляции составляет 9331 Гц (мин. 43 Гц, макс. 142900 Гц).

 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000201020202030Tooltip
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), , Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1835 (1810.86-1981.87)
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1875 (1847.15-1952.27)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1998 (1943.92-2022.14)
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1887 (1855.46-1948.65)
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
514 Points ∼100% +1%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
509 Points ∼99%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
498 Points ∼97% -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
Intel Core i9-9980HK
481 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U
460 Points ∼89% -10%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
441 Points ∼86% -13%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
416 Points ∼81% -18%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
416 Points ∼81% -18%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
403 Points ∼78% -21%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
388 Points ∼75% -24%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
358 Points ∼70% -30%
CPU (Multi Core)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
6910 Points ∼100% +55%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
4463 Points ∼65%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
3712 Points ∼54% -17%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
3677 Points ∼53% -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
Intel Core i9-9980HK
3197 Points ∼46% -28%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2924 Points ∼42% -34%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
2622 Points ∼38% -41%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U
2598 Points ∼38% -42%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
2333 Points ∼34% -48%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1783 Points ∼26% -60%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1411 Points ∼20% -68%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
215 Points ∼99%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points ∼97% -1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
209 Points ∼96% -3%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Intel Core i9-9900K
207 Points ∼95% -4%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
203 Points ∼93% -6%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
192 Points ∼88% -11%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U
191 Points ∼88% -11%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼87% -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
Intel Core i9-9980HK
181 Points ∼83% -16%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points ∼78% -20%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
171 Points ∼78% -20%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
157 (min: 155, max: 159) Points ∼72% -27%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
149 Points ∼68% -31%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
146 Points ∼67% -32%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points ∼66% -33%
CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
3049 Points ∼70% +55%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Intel Core i9-9900K
1979 Points ∼45% +1%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K
1968 Points ∼45% 0%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
1962 Points ∼45%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼39% -12%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
1617 (min: 1603, max: 1630) Points ∼37% -18%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points ∼32% -28%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1359 Points ∼31% -31%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1327 Points ∼30% -32%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1288 Points ∼29% -34%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1217 Points ∼28% -38%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points ∼26% -43%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U
1103 Points ∼25% -44%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
730 Points ∼17% -63%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
676 Points ∼15% -66%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
2.43 Points ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
2.36 Points ∼97% -3%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.16 Points ∼89% -11%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
2.11 Points ∼86% -13%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1.96 Points ∼80% -19%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
1.79 Points ∼73% -26%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.65 Points ∼68% -32%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.63 Points ∼67% -33%
CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
33.44 Points ∼76% +50%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
22.31 Points ∼51%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
18.94 Points ∼43% -15%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
18 (min: 17.98, max: 18.08) Points ∼41% -19%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15.76 Points ∼36% -29%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
14.98 Points ∼34% -33%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
14.11 Points ∼32% -37%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.16 Points ∼18% -63%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
8143 Points ∼75%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
7735 Points ∼71% -5%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
7243 Points ∼67% -11%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
6967 Points ∼64% -14%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
6579 Points ∼61% -19%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
5992 Points ∼55% -26%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5568 Points ∼51% -32%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
5062 Points ∼47% -38%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
4286 Points ∼40% -47%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
50462 Points ∼77%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
45047 Points ∼69% -11%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
42456 Points ∼65% -16%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
38810 Points ∼59% -23%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
36591 Points ∼56% -27%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
32846 Points ∼50% -35%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
32833 Points ∼50% -35%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
29330 Points ∼45% -42%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21976 Points ∼34% -56%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
120.923 s * ∼1% -29%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
118.733 s * ∼1% -27%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
104 s * ∼1% -11%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
93.79 s * ∼1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
57.495 s * ∼1% +39%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
677.2 Seconds * ∼3% -63%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
511.147 Seconds * ∼2% -23%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
476.493 Seconds * ∼2% -15%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
465.128 Seconds * ∼2% -12%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
416.054 Seconds * ∼2%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
147 (min: 147, max: 148) fps ∼83% +27%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
116 fps ∼65%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
102.39 fps ∼58% -12%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
81.8 fps ∼46% -29%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
73 fps ∼41% -37%
Pass 1
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
276.16 fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
267.5 (min: 266, max: 268) fps ∼97% -3%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
217 fps ∼79% -21%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
163 fps ∼59% -41%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
160.7 fps ∼58% -42%
WinRAR - Result
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
8156 KB/s ∼96%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
7529 KB/s ∼88% -8%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
6683 KB/s ∼78% -18%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
3814 KB/s ∼45% -53%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
3364 KB/s ∼39% -59%
TrueCrypt
Serpent Mean 100MB
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
1.7 GB/s ∼77% +42%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
1.2 GB/s ∼55%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
0.83 GB/s ∼38% -31%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
0.757 GB/s ∼34% -37%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
0.682 GB/s ∼31% -43%
Twofish Mean 100MB
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
2.9 GB/s ∼78% +38%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
2.1 GB/s ∼57%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
1.5 GB/s ∼41% -29%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.3 GB/s ∼35% -38%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1.3 GB/s ∼35% -38%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
0.999 GB/s ∼27% -52%
AES Mean 100MB
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
12.1 GB/s ∼58%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
10.9 GB/s ∼53% -10%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
9.8 GB/s ∼47% -19%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
7.5 GB/s ∼36% -38%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
7.4 GB/s ∼36% -39%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
6 GB/s ∼29% -50%
Geekbench 4.0
Compute OpenCL Score
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
288102 Points ∼99%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
73460 Points ∼25% -75%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
35932 Points ∼100%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
21180 Points ∼59% -41%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
12448 Points ∼35% -65%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
6313 Points ∼100%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
4481 Points ∼71% -29%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4119 Points ∼65% -35%
Blender 2.79 - ---
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
293 Seconds * ∼3% -20%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
290 Seconds * ∼3% -19%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
244 Seconds * ∼3%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
162.3 Seconds * ∼2% +33%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
82119 MIPS ∼79% +49%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
55064 MIPS ∼53%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
46591 MIPS ∼45% -15%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
5674 MIPS ∼82%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
5533 MIPS ∼80% -2%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
4924 MIPS ∼71% -13%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
20.9 fps ∼69% +36%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
15.315 fps ∼50%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
11.865 fps ∼39% -23%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6.39 fps ∼21% -58%

* ... меньше = лучше

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
15720
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
50462
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
8143
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
99.09 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
22.31 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.43 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
174.67 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1962 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
215 Points
?
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), , Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
11245 Points ∼94%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
11191 Points ∼93% 0%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
10929 Points ∼91% -3%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
9239 Points ∼77% -18%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
6266 Points ∼52% -44%
Productivity
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), , Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
9077 Points ∼94%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
8702 Points ∼90% -4%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
8416 Points ∼87% -7%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
8068 Points ∼83% -11%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
6811 Points ∼70% -25%
Essentials
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), , Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
11266 Points ∼100%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
10466 Points ∼93% -7%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
10275 Points ∼91% -9%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
10150 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
8360 Points ∼74% -26%
Score
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), , Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
7511 Points ∼97%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
7171 Points ∼92% -5%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
7006 Points ∼90% -7%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6599 Points ∼85% -12%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
5084 Points ∼65% -32%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), , Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
6464 Points ∼99%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
6352 Points ∼97% -2%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
6140 Points ∼94% -5%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
5110 Points ∼78% -21%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), , Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
5744 Points ∼94%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
5610 Points ∼92% -2%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
5607 Points ∼92% -2%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
4173 Points ∼68% -27%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5744 баллов
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6464 баллов
?
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
CUK Cyclone 500GB M.2 NVMe
Eurocom Sky X4C
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe
AS SSD
-64%
-54%
-50%
-8%
3%
Copy Game MB/s
1755.68
755.35
-57%
650.44
-63%
1054.98
-40%
Copy Program MB/s
731.4
452.76
-38%
426.02
-42%
467.16
-36%
Copy ISO MB/s
3006.73
1269.47
-58%
1061.83
-65%
1908.08
-37%
Score Total
4811
930
-81%
1332
-72%
1065
-78%
3040
-37%
4615
-4%
Score Write
2471
293
-88%
586
-76%
366
-85%
902
-63%
1703
-31%
Score Read
1552
420
-73%
489
-68%
475
-69%
1433
-8%
1945
25%
Access Time Write *
0.098
0.045
54%
0.046
53%
0.037
62%
0.042
57%
0.03
69%
Access Time Read *
0.078
0.168
-115%
0.24
-208%
0.132
-69%
0.05
36%
0.032
59%
4K-64 Write
2123.99
170.58
-92%
403.79
-81%
191.35
-91%
647.89
-69%
1374.74
-35%
4K-64 Read
1292.69
350.3
-73%
323.8
-75%
302.13
-77%
1144.38
-11%
1645.75
27%
4K Write
127.3
77.33
-39%
90.1
-29%
99.89
-22%
87.67
-31%
129.64
2%
4K Read
31.67
19.55
-38%
48.88
54%
35.42
12%
49.17
55%
44.83
42%
Seq Write
2198.09
446.99
-80%
919
-58%
746
-66%
1664.55
-24%
1988.74
-10%
Seq Read
2279.76
505.83
-78%
1163
-49%
1372
-40%
2399.1
5%
2541.23
11%

* ... меньше = лучше

Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3559 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2334 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 570.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 490.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1891 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1836 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 63.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 188.8 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 3900X
8537 Points ∼100% +47%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, 2700X
6745 Points ∼79% +16%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
5852 Points ∼69% +1%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop),
5799 Points ∼68%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (5377 - 5942, n=13)
5649 Points ∼66% -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
5295 Points ∼62% -9%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
4467 Points ∼52% -23%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
3738 Points ∼44% -36%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
3193 Points ∼37% -45%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 3900X
13744 Points ∼94% +39%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, 2700X
11477 Points ∼78% +16%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
11294 Points ∼77% +15%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
10720 Points ∼73% +9%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (9480 - 10992, n=13)
10087 Points ∼69% +2%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop),
9854 Points ∼67%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
8299 Points ∼57% -16%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
7732 Points ∼53% -22%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
7722 Points ∼53% -22%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
6387 Points ∼44% -35%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
5660 Points ∼39% -43%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 3900X
32081 Points ∼79% +26%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
27620 Points ∼68% +8%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
27080 Points ∼67% +6%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, 2700X
27075 Points ∼67% +6%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop),
25497 Points ∼63%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (22820 - 27319, n=14)
25348 Points ∼62% -1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
22260 Points ∼55% -13%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
19846 Points ∼49% -22%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
19338 Points ∼48% -24%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
17419 Points ∼43% -32%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
15398 Points ∼38% -40%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
161161 Points ∼87% +3%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 3900X
157746 Points ∼85% +1%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop),
155800 Points ∼84%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
138058 Points ∼75% -11%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, 2700X
137520 Points ∼75% -12%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (72806 - 168006, n=14)
135517 Points ∼73% -13%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
119860 Points ∼65% -23%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
118058 Points ∼64% -24%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
114009 Points ∼62% -27%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
107083 Points ∼58% -31%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
101947 Points ∼55% -35%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 3900X
383142 Points ∼53%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
322455 Points ∼44%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
305160 Points ∼42%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, 2700X
276319 Points ∼38%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
 
164011 Points ∼22%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
150368 Points ∼21%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop),
18934 Points ∼84%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 3900X
18340 Points ∼81% -3%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
17290 Points ∼76% -9%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (9038 - 18934, n=15)
14411 Points ∼64% -24%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
13742 Points ∼61% -27%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
13644 Points ∼60% -28%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, 2700X
13548 Points ∼60% -28%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
12323 Points ∼55% -35%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
12064 Points ∼53% -36%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
11610 Points ∼51% -39%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
10851 Points ∼48% -43%
1280x720 Performance GPU
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 3900X
45050 Points ∼88% +29%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
38485 Points ∼75% +10%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
37989 Points ∼75% +9%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, 2700X
37958 Points ∼74% +9%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (31826 - 38809, n=15)
35474 Points ∼70% +2%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop),
34846 Points ∼68%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
29436 Points ∼58% -16%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
26413 Points ∼52% -24%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
25500 Points ∼50% -27%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
21861 Points ∼43% -37%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
19513 Points ∼38% -44%
3DMark 06 Standard
47829 баллов
3DMark 11 Performance
28993 баллов
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
60073 баллов
3DMark Fire Strike Score
22556 баллов
3DMark Time Spy Score
10012 баллов
?
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
Ryzen 9 3900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
130 fps ∼100% +5%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
124 fps ∼95%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
123 fps ∼95% -1%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
110 fps ∼85% -11%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
110 fps ∼85% -11%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
109 fps ∼84% -12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
105 fps ∼81% -15%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (69 - 124, n=7)
103 fps ∼79% -17%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
91 fps ∼70% -27%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
90 fps ∼69% -27%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
87 fps ∼67% -30%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
81 fps ∼62% -35%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
80 fps ∼62% -35%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
73 fps ∼56% -41%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
35 fps ∼27% -72%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
Ryzen 9 3900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
135 (min: 118, max: 158) fps ∼100% +41%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
109 (min: 94, max: 120) fps ∼81% +14%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
109 (min: 81, max: 123) fps ∼81% +14%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
101.1 fps ∼75% +6%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
100 fps ∼74% +5%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
95.5 fps ∼71%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (82.2 - 105, n=14)
95.4 fps ∼71% 0%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
95.3 fps ∼71% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
92.7 fps ∼69% -3%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
90.3 fps ∼67% -5%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
81.3 fps ∼60% -15%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
77.4 fps ∼57% -19%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
76 (min: 67, max: 84) fps ∼56% -20%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
75.3 fps ∼56% -21%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
72.7 (min: 61, max: 82) fps ∼54% -24%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
72 fps ∼53% -25%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
72 (min: 61, max: 84) fps ∼53% -25%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
63.6 fps ∼47% -33%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
62.2 fps ∼46% -35%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
60.5 fps ∼45% -37%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
60.4 (min: 49) fps ∼45% -37%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
60 fps ∼44% -37%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
56.9 (min: 48) fps ∼42% -40%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700, AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
37.4 (min: 31) fps ∼28% -61%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
30.8 fps ∼23% -68%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
9.6 fps ∼7% -90%
0102030405060708090100