Notebookcheck

Краткий обзор ноутбука Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T

2-килограммовая рабочая станция. Новая мобильная рабочая станция Asus получила от нас достаточно высокую оценку за отличную производительность, качественный 4K дисплей и видеокарту с 16 ГБ видеопамяти. Модель также может похвастаться 32 ГБ ОЗУ и SSD на 1 ТБ, однако порта Thunderbolt 3 здесь нет.
Sascha Mölck (перевод Anton Avdyushkin),

Это сокращенная версия обзора, которая содержит только результаты тестов и вердикт. Полный обзор на английском языке вы найдете здесь

Хорошо (83%) ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750HNVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q Workstation - 09/11/2020 - v7
Тестовый образец выдан нам компанией Asus Deutschland
Сохранить защищённую авторским правом картинку с итоговым рейтингом в формате PNG / SVG
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Процессор
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL2 / Sustained, Coffee Lake-H
Графический адаптер
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q - 16384 Мбайт, Ядро: 600-1350 МГц, Память: 1500 МГц, 80 W TDP, GDDR6, 27.21.14.5257 (Nvidia 452.57), Optimus
Оперативная память
32768 Мбайт 
, DDR4-2666, dual-channel, one memory slot (occupied), 16 GB onboard, 32 GB in our review model, 48 GB (maximum amount)
Дисплей
15.60 дюйм. 16:9, 3840 x 2160 пикс. 282 точек/дюйм, AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, глянцевое покрытие: Нет, 60 Hz
Материнская плата
Intel HM370
Хранение данных
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 Гбайт 
, 2x M.2-2280-Slot, RAID 0, 890 Гбайт свободно
Интерфейсы
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen 1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 слот замка Kensington, Аудиоразъёмы: combination headphone/microphone jack, TPM 2.0
Коммуникации
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Габариты
высота х ширина х глубина (мм): 18.9 x 360 x 252
Аккумулятор
76 Вт⋅ч, 4940 мА⋅ч литий-полимерн., 15.4 V
Операционная система
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Дополнительно
акустическая система: Stereo, клавиатура: chiclet-style, подсветка клавиатуры: ✔, McAfee LiveSafe (trial version), MS Office 365 (trial version), 24 мес. гарантии в Европе
Вес
2 Кг, адаптер питания: 795 г
Стоимость
5500 Euro
Внимание: Разные образцы одной и той же модели часто используют неодинаковые компоненты! (Матрица AUO вместо BOE, память Hynix вместо Samsung, накопитель SATA вместо PCIe, ...)

 

Рейтинг
Дата
Модель
Вес
Высота
Размер
Разрешение
Стоимость от
83 %
11/2020
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2 Кг18.9 мм15.60"3840x2160
83 %
09/2020
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
i9-10980HK, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2.3 Кг19.8 мм15.60"1920x1080
88 %
09/2020
Dell Precision 7550
W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2.8 Кг27.36 мм15.60"3840x2160
87 %
08/2020
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
i7-10875H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2.2 Кг13.98 мм15.60"3840x2160
360 mm 242 mm 27.36 mm 2.8 kg360 mm 252 mm 18.9 mm 2 kg358 mm 248 mm 19.8 mm 2.3 kg355 mm 235 mm 13.98 mm 2.2 kg

Порты

Левая сторона: разъем питания, гигабитный Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), микрофонный вход, выход на наушники
Левая сторона: разъем питания, гигабитный Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), микрофонный вход, выход на наушники
Правая сторона: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-C), 2х USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), слот замка Kensington
Правая сторона: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-C), 2х USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), слот замка Kensington
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1368 (735min - 1454max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1353 (1259min - 1416max) MBit/s ∼99%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1316 (579min - 1479max) MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Усредн. модель с Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1640, n=68)
1114 MBit/s ∼81% -18%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
899 (873min - 913max) MBit/s ∼66% -34%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1595 (1327min - 1824max) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1476 (1355min - 1581max) MBit/s ∼93% +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1346 (1260min - 1382max) MBit/s ∼84%
Усредн. модель с Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (447 - 1645, n=67)
1020 MBit/s ∼64% -24%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1011 (507min - 1065max) MBit/s ∼63% -25%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1352 (1259-1416)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (873-913)
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1315 (579-1479)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1368 (735-1454)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1346 (1260-1382)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1476 (1355-1581)
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø994 (507-1065)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1595 (1327-1824)
329
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
Равномерность подсветки экрана
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Максимум: 344 cd/m² В среднем: 334.8 cd/m² Minimum: 18.5 cd/m²
Равномерность подсветки: 93 %
От батареи: 337 cd/m²
Контрастность: 930:1 (Уровень чёрного: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.76 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 3.12 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
98% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 85% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
AU Optronics B156HAB03.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell Precision 7550
AU Optronics B156ZAN, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Response Times
21%
8%
91%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
58 (27, 31)
44.8 (21.2, 23.6)
23%
51.2 (24.4, 26.8)
12%
4 (2, 2)
93%
Response Time Black / White *
35 (20, 15)
28.8 (17.2, 11.6)
18%
34 (20, 14)
3%
4 (2, 2)
89%
PWM Frequency
Параметры экрана
-25%
-33%
192%
Яркость в центре
344
374.5
9%
473.5
38%
380
10%
Brightness
335
363
8%
461
38%
388
16%
Brightness Distribution
93
91
-2%
90
-3%
93
0%
Уровень чёрного *
0.37
0.42
-14%
0.55
-49%
0.018
95%
Контрастность
930
892
-4%
861
-7%
21111
2170%
Colorchecker DeltaE *
1.76
4.05
-130%
4.8
-173%
5.47
-211%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.31
8.17
-90%
8.73
-103%
8.19
-90%
DeltaE для серого *
3.12
2.6
17%
5.6
-79%
5.3
-70%
Гамма
2.2 100%
2.21 100%
2.34 94%
2.15 102%
CCT
6563 99%
7027 93%
7549 86%
6128 106%
Покрытие спектра AdobeRGB, %
85
56.4
-34%
86.4
2%
86
1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98
86.3
-12%
99.7
2%
100
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.36
3.08
3.04
Среднее значение
-2% / -18%
-13% / -27%
142% / 175%

* ... меньше = лучше

Дисплей: тест на время отклика

Время отклика показывает, как быстро дисплей устройства способен сменить цвет изображения с одного на другой. Недостаточно быстрый отклик может привести к деформации подвижных фрагментов изображения, появлении теней и размытости. Отсутствие таких проблем особенно важно для просмотра фильмов и для игр.
       Перемена цвета пикселей, чёрный - белый (1) и белый - чёрный (2)
35 ms ... стадия 1 ↗ и стадия 2 ↘ в сумме↗ 20 ms стадия 1
↘ 15 ms стадия 2
Это очень большое время отклика. Экран явно не ориентирован на игры и подобные применения.
Для сравнения, самый лучший результат среди всех известных нам устройств равен 0.8 миллисек., самый худший - 240 миллисек. » 90% экранов из нашей базы данных показали более хороший результат.
Таким образом, тестируемое устройство находится в нижней половине рейтинга (оно отстаёт от среднего результата, равного 24.3 миллисек.)
       Перемена цвета пикселей, серый 50% - серый 80% (1) и серый 80% - серый 50% (2)
58 ms ... стадия 1 ↗ и стадия 2 ↘ в сумме↗ 27 ms стадия 1
↘ 31 ms стадия 2
Это очень большое время отклика. Экран явно не ориентирован на игры и подобные применения.
Для сравнения, самый лучший результат среди всех известных нам устройств равен 0.8 миллисек., самый худший - 636 миллисек. » 93% экранов из нашей базы данных показали более хороший результат.
Таким образом, тестируемое устройство находится в нижней половине рейтинга (оно отстаёт от среднего результата, равного 38.6 миллисек.)

Тест на мерцание

Некоторые устройства устанавливают яркость экрана при помощи быстрого включения-выключения светодиодов вместо простого понижения напряжения их питания. Такой метод обозначается аббревиатурой ШИМ (или PWM). Он часто приводит к полоскам или ряби на изображении, а также к быстрой усталости глаз и головной боли. Мы проверяем, используется ли PWM в тестируемом устройстве, и если да, то при каких условиях.
Ура! ШИМ не обнаружено

Для сравнения, 51 % известных нам устройств не применяют PWM для изменения яркости, а среди тех, где PWM используется, типичная частота модуляции составляет 9596 Гц (мин. 5 Гц, макс. 142900 Гц).

010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820183018401850Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1024 (977.33-1282.22)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H; Rendering: Ø1269 (1260.16-1286.11)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1668 (1647.11-1843.74)
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M, Intel Xeon W-10885M: Ø1606 (1577.91-1652.14)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1016 (1009.67-1136.43)
Частота ЦП в CB15
Частота ЦП в CB15
Частота ЦП в CB15 (Режим rendering)
Частота ЦП в CB15 (Режим rendering)
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
188 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1282 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
175.25 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.62 %
?
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
210 Points ∼100% +12%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
208 Points ∼99% +11%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
193 Points ∼92% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
188 Points ∼90%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
188 Points ∼90% 0%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=82)
184 Points ∼88% -2%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (117 - 214, n=115)
165 Points ∼79% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1714 (1647.11min - 1843.74max) Points ∼100% +34%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1652 (1577.91min - 1652.14max) Points ∼96% +29%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
1286 Points ∼75% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
1282 Points ∼75%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H
  (952 - 1306, n=85)
1182 Points ∼69% -8%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
1111 Points ∼65% -13%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (260 - 1714, n=119)
847 Points ∼49% -34%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (273 - 881, n=30)
473 Seconds * ∼100% -9%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
435.2 Seconds * ∼92%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H
  (342 - 495, n=21)
433 Seconds * ∼92% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
386.2 Seconds * ∼82% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
342.1 Seconds * ∼72% +21%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
281 Seconds * ∼59% +35%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
273 Seconds * ∼58% +37%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
48730 MIPS ∼100% +50%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
48044 MIPS ∼99% +48%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
38363 MIPS ∼79% +18%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
34535 MIPS ∼71% +6%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (16182 - 48730, n=27)
32928 MIPS ∼68% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
32555 MIPS ∼67%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28512 - 35174, n=21)
32357 MIPS ∼66% -1%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
5495 MIPS ∼100% +13%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5335 MIPS ∼97% +10%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
5310 MIPS ∼97% +9%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (4503 - 5510, n=27)
5020 MIPS ∼91% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
4865 MIPS ∼89%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H
  (4580 - 5090, n=21)
4846 MIPS ∼88% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
4695 MIPS ∼85% -3%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
500 Points ∼100% +8%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
488 Points ∼98% +6%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
473 Points ∼95% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
462 Points ∼92%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (374 - 505, n=23)
456 Points ∼91% -1%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H
  (416 - 486, n=55)
443 Points ∼89% -4%
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
4161 Points ∼100% +33%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
3930 Points ∼94% +25%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
3133 Points ∼75%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
2800 Points ∼67% -11%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (988 - 4161, n=24)
2689 Points ∼65% -14%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H
  (2017 - 3133, n=55)
2564 Points ∼62% -18%
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
8378 Points ∼100% +44%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8347 Points ∼100% +44%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
7189 Points ∼86% +24%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (4622 - 8491, n=15)
6751 Points ∼81% +16%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
5813 Points ∼69%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H
  (4859 - 6262, n=13)
5597 Points ∼67% -4%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1341 Points ∼100% +11%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1331 Points ∼99% +10%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
1289 Points ∼96% +7%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (1184 - 1347, n=14)
1272 Points ∼95% +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
1207 Points ∼90%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1117 - 1251, n=13)
1190 Points ∼89% -1%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
13.1 fps ∼100% +58%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13 fps ∼99% +57%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
10.7 fps ∼82% +29%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
10.1 fps ∼77% +22%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (4.2 - 13.6, n=27)
8.88 fps ∼68% +7%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H
  (7.1 - 10.7, n=21)
8.72 fps ∼67% +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
8.3 fps ∼63%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
59.96 s ∼100% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
59.75 s ∼100%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H
  (54.5 - 64.7, n=9)
59 s ∼98% -1%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (43 - 64.7, n=13)
52.4 s ∼87% -12%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
47.15 s ∼79% -21%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
46.5 s ∼78% -22%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
44 s ∼73% -26%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
0.658 sec * ∼100% -2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.643 sec * ∼98%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H
  (0.608 - 0.695, n=14)
0.643 sec * ∼98% -0%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (0.568 - 0.695, n=12)
0.61 sec * ∼93% +5%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.586 sec * ∼89% +9%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.574 sec * ∼87% +11%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
0.57 sec * ∼87% +11%

* ... меньше = лучше

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3524 баллов
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3985 баллов
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4436 баллов
PCMark 10 Score
4877 баллов
?
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
7360 Points ∼50% +48%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (4962 - 6601, n=2)
5782 Points ∼40% +17%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5640 Points ∼39% +14%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (2329 - 10441, n=57)
5230 Points ∼36% +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4962 Points ∼34%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4563 Points ∼31% -8%
Productivity
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8877 Points ∼80% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7796 Points ∼70% +8%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
7735 Points ∼69% +7%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (3998 - 8877, n=57)
7218 Points ∼65% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7205 Points ∼65%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (6892 - 7205, n=2)
7049 Points ∼63% -2%
Essentials
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
10829 Points ∼95% +23%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
9811 Points ∼86% +11%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8890 Points ∼78% +1%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (8809 - 8970, n=2)
8890 Points ∼78% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8809 Points ∼77%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (5223 - 10829, n=57)
8784 Points ∼77% 0%
Score
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
5904 Points ∼67% +21%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5846 Points ∼67% +20%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (4877 - 5317, n=2)
5097 Points ∼58% +5%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (2817 - 6939, n=58)
4916 Points ∼56% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4884 Points ∼56% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4877 Points ∼56%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
4418 Points ∼71% +25%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (2320 - 5505, n=94)
3974 Points ∼64% +13%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
3781 Points ∼61% +7%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3654 Points ∼59% +4%
Усредн. модель с Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (3524 - 3551, n=2)
3538 Points ∼57% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3524 Points ∼57%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1938.1 μs * ∼100%

* ... меньше = лучше

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3502 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2390 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 397.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 340.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2431 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2387 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 43.38 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 1107 MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Dell Precision 7550
SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Усредн. модель с Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
 
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
3%
-13%
-2%
-14%
-16%
Write 4K
1107
185.8
-83%
121
-89%
132.9
-88%
166 (92.4 - 1107, n=24)
-85%
157 (97.8 - 1107, n=53)
-86%
Read 4K
43.38
47.21
9%
42.16
-3%
46.73
8%
44.5 (37 - 52.6, n=24)
3%
46.4 (23.9 - 74.9, n=53)
7%
Write Seq
2387
2874
20%
2150
-10%
2214
-7%
1965 (981 - 2387, n=24)
-18%
1645 (396 - 2874, n=53)
-31%
Read Seq
2431
1786
-27%
1755
-28%
2018
-17%
1746 (976 - 2543, n=24)
-28%
1832 (786 - 2972, n=53)
-25%
Write 4K Q32T1
340.7
466.8
37%
395.3
16%
478.9
41%
395 (205 - 603, n=24)
16%
414 (250 - 606, n=54)
22%
Read 4K Q32T1
397.8
562.8
41%
381.8
-4%
540.2
36%
430 (270 - 592, n=24)
8%
464 (241 - 698, n=54)
17%
Write Seq Q32T1
2390
3091
29%
2730
14%
2975
24%
2349 (1706 - 2404, n=24)
-2%
1894 (342 - 3101, n=54)
-21%
Read Seq Q32T1
3502
3395
-3%
3468
-1%
3195
-9%
3229 (1758 - 3505, n=24)
-8%
3084 (1761 - 3539, n=54)
-12%
AS SSD
8%
-31%
-12%
-9%
-163%
Copy Game MB/s
1336.11
1624.51
22%
1476.6
11%
1139.5
-15%
1291 (865 - 1677, n=17)
-3%
747 (35.3 - 1625, n=92)
-44%
Copy Program MB/s
564.27
790.95
40%
627.09
11%
501.25
-11%
549 (198 - 874, n=17)
-3%
357 (16.2 - 791, n=92)
-37%
Copy ISO MB/s
2302.06
2588.93
12%
1768.18
-23%
1981.66
-14%
2271 (1375 - 3193, n=17)
-1%
1190 (41.7 - 3259, n=92)
-48%
Score Total
4835
5630
16%
3801
-21%
4781
-1%
4549 (2742 - 5482, n=25)
-6%
2628 (28 - 5810, n=108)
-46%
Score Write
2136
2601
22%
1762
-18%
2155
1%
1930 (1323 - 2249, n=25)
-10%
1001 (11 - 2601, n=108)
-53%
Score Read
1798
1993
11%
1373
-24%
1726
-4%
1729 (966 - 2189, n=25)
-4%
1088 (11 - 2333, n=108)
-39%
Access Time Write *
0.034
0.068
-100%
0.106
-212%
0.04
-18%
0.054 (0.026 - 0.208, n=25)
-59%
0.309 (0.017 - 15, n=116)
-809%
Access Time Read *
0.046
0.057
-24%
0.069
-50%
0.087
-89%
0.0518 (0.033 - 0.089, n=25)
-13%
0.506 (0.028 - 16.8, n=114)
-1000%
4K-64 Write
1793.98
2174.26
21%
1537.04
-14%
1841.59
3%
1615 (992 - 1878, n=25)
-10%
736 (0.94 - 2174, n=116)
-59%
4K-64 Read
1490.62
1712.16
15%
1128.12
-24%
1480.51
-1%
1487 (693 - 1865, n=25)
0%
836 (0.75 - 2009, n=116)
-44%
4K Write
107.12
165.06
54%
105.49
-2%
88.16
-18%
110 (10.3 - 146, n=25)
3%
101 (0.9 - 212, n=116)
-6%
4K Read
37.59
48.57
29%
42.31
13%
47.13
25%
46.3 (27 - 56.8, n=25)
23%
37.2 (0.49 - 69.6, n=116)
-1%
Seq Write
2347.81
2619.99
12%
1192.77
-49%
2251.61
-4%
2020 (1220 - 2424, n=25)
-14%
1080 (85.2 - 2640, n=116)
-54%
Seq Read
2702.12
2321.37
-14%
2027.61
-25%
1982.19
-27%
1953 (870 - 2958, n=25)
-28%
1546 (97.2 - 2995, n=116)
-43%
Среднее значение
6% / 6%
-22% / -24%
-7% / -8%
-12% / -11%
-90% / -110%

* ... меньше = лучше

Continuous read speed: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900200021002200230024002500260027002800290030003100320033003400Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø3270 (2472.63-3356.07)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00: Ø3406 (2690.44-3422.34)
Dell Precision 7550 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB: Ø3251 (1331.55-3434.09)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø3028 (2495.82-3053.66)
3DMark 11 Performance
20824 баллов
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29456 баллов
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16986 баллов
3DMark Time Spy Score
6972 баллов
?
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
27607 Points ∼100% +5%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
27290 Points ∼99% +4%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (24156 - 28524, n=8)
26632 Points ∼96% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
26550 Points ∼96% +1%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
26242 Points ∼95% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
26219 Points ∼95%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (841 - 32999, n=129)
8452 Points ∼31% -68%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
7645 Points ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
7459 Points ∼98% +3%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (6999 - 7977, n=9)
7431 Points ∼97% +3%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
7349 Points ∼96% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
7331 Points ∼96% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
7234 Points ∼95%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (566 - 9956, n=48)
4074 Points ∼53% -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
20164 Points ∼100% +3%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
19924 Points ∼99% +2%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (18247 - 21115, n=9)
19833 Points ∼98% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
19616 Points ∼97%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
19353 Points ∼96% -1%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
19342 Points ∼96% -1%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (752 - 24354, n=120)
6751 Points ∼33% -66%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
126073 Points ∼100% +125%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (50993 - 126073, n=6)
81010 Points ∼64% +45%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
71388 Points ∼57% +28%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
55927 Points ∼44%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
50993 Points ∼40% -9%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (5836 - 133756, n=118)
37861 Points ∼30% -32%
SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
156.91 fps ∼100% +33%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
138.42 fps ∼88% +17%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
135.9 fps ∼87% +15%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (107 - 157, n=7)
126 fps ∼80% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
118.27 fps ∼75%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (15.6 - 230, n=99)
83.2 fps ∼53% -30%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
165.01 fps ∼100% +33%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
152.9 fps ∼93% +23%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (125 - 165, n=7)
143 fps ∼87% +15%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
127.52 fps ∼77% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
124.52 fps ∼75%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (4.87 - 258, n=99)
68.5 fps ∼42% -45%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
98.84 fps ∼100% +11%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
96.9 fps ∼98% +9%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
96.14 fps ∼97% +8%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (89 - 98.8, n=7)
95.2 fps ∼96% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
89 fps ∼90%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (3.93 - 126, n=97)
38.1 fps ∼39% -57%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
66.4 fps ∼100% +15%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
65.81 fps ∼99% +14%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
63.34 fps ∼95% +10%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (57.8 - 66.4, n=7)
62.7 fps ∼94% +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
57.83 fps ∼87%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (0.99 - 109, n=99)
26.6 fps ∼40% -54%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
105.42 fps ∼100% +43%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
92.7 fps ∼88% +26%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (73.8 - 105, n=7)
85.3 fps ∼81% +16%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
76.36 fps ∼72% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
73.82 fps ∼70%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (5.4 - 179, n=100)
50.3 fps ∼48% -32%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
14.82 fps ∼100% +7%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
14.4 fps ∼97% +4%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (13.3 - 16.1, n=7)
14.4 fps ∼97% +4%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
13.93 fps ∼94% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
13.82 fps ∼93%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (0.06 - 26, n=100)
5.61 fps ∼38% -59%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
145.14 fps ∼100% +27%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
136.01 fps ∼94% +19%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (114 - 145, n=7)
126 fps ∼87% +10%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
122.7 fps ∼85% +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
114.13 fps ∼79%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (14 - 172, n=100)
63.8 fps ∼44% -44%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
154.88 fps ∼100% +37%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
133.7 fps ∼86% +18%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (113 - 155, n=7)
127 fps ∼82% +12%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
125 fps ∼81% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
113.08 fps ∼73%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (13.4 - 220, n=100)
69.4 fps ∼45% -39%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
184.2 fps ∼100% +16%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (159 - 184, n=4)
176 fps ∼96% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
158.88 fps ∼86%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (11.4 - 236, n=27)
84.8 fps ∼46% -47%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
158.94 fps ∼100% +33%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
150.44 fps ∼95% +26%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
138.3 fps ∼87% +16%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (120 - 159, n=7)
134 fps ∼84% +12%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
119.66 fps ∼75%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (37.3 - 217, n=38)
110 fps ∼69% -8%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
306.13 fps ∼100% +25%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
295.24 fps ∼96% +21%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
292.9 fps ∼96% +20%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (244 - 306, n=7)
287 fps ∼94% +18%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
244.13 fps ∼80%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (36.4 - 465, n=37)
189 fps ∼62% -23%
Showcase (showcase-02)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
98.74 fps ∼100% +11%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
97.2 fps ∼98% +9%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
95.24 fps ∼96% +7%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (89.2 - 98.7, n=7)
95.1 fps ∼96% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
89.2 fps ∼90%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (12.6 - 127, n=37)
57 fps ∼58% -36%
Medical (medical-02)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
102.53 fps ∼100% +15%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
99.1 fps ∼97% +11%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
97.67 fps ∼95% +10%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (79 - 103, n=7)
89.7 fps ∼87% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
88.89 fps ∼87%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (6.8 - 133, n=37)
48.5 fps ∼47% -45%
Maya (maya-05)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
231.32 fps ∼100% +29%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
214.3 fps ∼93% +19%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
210.39 fps ∼91% +17%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (180 - 231, n=7)
207 fps ∼89% +15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
179.51 fps ∼78%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (29.4 - 341, n=37)
140 fps ∼61% -22%
Energy (energy-02)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
38.34 fps ∼100% +8%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
36.9 fps ∼96% +4%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (35.4 - 38.3, n=7)
36.9 fps ∼96% +4%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
36.8 fps ∼96% +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
35.39 fps ∼92%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (0.72 - 57.3, n=37)
19.1 fps ∼50% -46%
Creo (creo-02)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
238.42 fps ∼100% +31%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
231.9 fps ∼97% +27%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
224.9 fps ∼94% +24%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (182 - 238, n=7)
217 fps ∼91% +19%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
181.9 fps ∼76%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (27.8 - 320, n=37)
141 fps ∼59% -22%
Catia (catia-05)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
259.66 fps ∼100% +39%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
242.87 fps ∼94% +30%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
225 fps ∼87% +20%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (187 - 260, n=7)
222 fps ∼85% +19%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
186.86 fps ∼72%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (27.7 - 339, n=37)
155 fps ∼60% -17%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
180.9 fps ∼100% +15%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
178.3 fps ∼99% +13%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
176.18 fps ∼97% +12%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (157 - 182, n=7)
174 fps ∼96% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
157.31 fps ∼87%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (20 - 232, n=38)
112 fps ∼62% -29%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (Rendering)
85.3 fps ∼100% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
84.6 fps ∼99%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
83.6 fps ∼98% -1%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (71 - 88.5, n=9)
82.2 fps ∼96% -3%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
81.1 (77min - 87max) fps ∼95% -4%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
77.3 (73min - 82max) fps ∼91% -9%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (5.7 - 110, n=77)
34.5 fps ∼40% -59%
Death Stranding - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
101.5 fps ∼100% +4%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (97.4 - 102, n=2)
99.5 fps ∼98% +2%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (97.4 - 102, n=2)
99.5 fps ∼98% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
97.4 fps ∼96%
Horizon Zero Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultimate Quality
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (rendering)
89 fps ∼100% +3%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (86 - 89, n=2)
87.5 fps ∼98% +2%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (86 - 89, n=2)
87.5 fps ∼98% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
86 fps ∼97%
Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (Rendering)
145.3 fps ∼100% +5%
Усредн. модель с NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (138 - 145, n=3)
141 fps ∼97% +2%
Усредн. модель класса Workstation
  (103 - 181, n=5)
141 fps ∼97% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
140.6 fps ∼97% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
137.8 fps ∼95%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095