Crosscall Action Серия
Процессор: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 662Графика: Qualcomm Adreno 610
Дисплей: 5.45 дюйм.
Вес: 0.2355килог.
Усреднённая оценка:
Усреднено 4 оценок (из 6 обзоров)
Усреднено 4 оценок (из 6 обзоров)
Crosscall Action-X5
Характеристики
Ноутбук: Crosscall Action-X5Процессор: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 662
Графика: Qualcomm Adreno 610
Дисплей: 5.45 дюйм., 18:9, 1440 x 720 пикс.
Вес: 0.2355килог.
Ссылки: Crosscall - сайт производителя
Price comparison
Усреднённая оценка:
Усреднено 4 оценок (из 6 обзоров)
Обзоры на других языках
Crosscall Action-X5 Display test
Источник: DxOMark
EN→RU
The Crosscall Action-X5’s IPS display performed best in indoor conditions, with acceptable readability and color reproduction, that was well suited for basic functions like web browsing (even though scrolling was not very smooth) and watching SDR videos, where the brightness was correct and details were well-rendered. The device was not well-suited for more demanding uses such as watching HDR10 and ultra HD videos, or gaming because of a lack of smoothness and visible aliasing. However, the device showed no flicker. For a device that was designed to be used outdoors, the Crosscall Action-X5 display was not well suited for outdoor conditions. Reading the screen outdoors was very difficult when the device was held at an angle. Also, users wearing polarized sunglasses will find that they have to hold the phone in a landscape position to read anything on the screen because the display turns black in portrait position.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 31 May 2022
Источник: DxOMark
EN→RUThe Crosscall Action-X5’s IPS display performed best in indoor conditions, with acceptable readability and color reproduction, that was well suited for basic functions like web browsing (even though scrolling was not very smooth) and watching SDR videos, where the brightness was correct and details were well-rendered. The device was not well-suited for more demanding uses such as watching HDR10 and ultra HD videos, or gaming because of a lack of smoothness and visible aliasing. However, the device showed no flicker. For a device that was designed to be used outdoors, the Crosscall Action-X5 display was not well suited for outdoor conditions. Reading the screen outdoors was very difficult when the device was held at an angle. Also, users wearing polarized sunglasses will find that they have to hold the phone in a landscape position to read anything on the screen because the display turns black in portrait position.
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 31 May 2022
Crosscall Action-X5 Camera test
Источник: DxOMark EN→RU
The French manufacturer Crosscall is known for smartphones that are designed for rough conditions, offering waterproof bodies, shock resistance and long battery life. The latest model, the Action-X5, is no exception and is targeted at outdoor lovers and athletes. Inside the rugged housing, the Android OS is powered by a Snapdragon 662 chipset and the 5.45-inch display offers an HD+ resolution. With an 48MP primary camera and a 13MP ultra-wide — no tele lens or bokeh mode — things look pretty simple in the camera department compared to some other devices in Crosscall’s price range. Let’s see how this rugged phone stacks up against more conventional competitors in the DXOMARK Camera test.
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 31 May 2022
Источник: DxOMark
EN→RUThe French manufacturer Crosscall is known for smartphones that are designed for rough conditions, offering waterproof bodies, shock resistance and long battery life. The latest model, the Action-X5, is no exception and is targeted at outdoor lovers and athletes. Inside the rugged housing, the Android OS is powered by a Snapdragon 662 chipset and the 5.45-inch display offers an HD+ resolution. With an 48MP primary camera and a 13MP ultra-wide — no tele lens or bokeh mode — things look pretty simple in the camera department compared to some other devices in Crosscall’s price range. Let’s see how this rugged phone stacks up against more conventional competitors in the DXOMARK Camera test.
Классический обзор, онлайн, малой длины, Дата: 31 May 2022
Crosscall Action-X5
Источник: PCtipp.ch
DE→RU
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 03 February 2022
Рейтинг: Итого: 90%
Источник: PCtipp.ch
DE→RUКлассический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 03 February 2022
Рейтинг: Итого: 90%
Crosscall Action X5 - Recensione
Источник: Geek 4 You
IT→RU
Классический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 10 March 2022
Рейтинг: Итого: 85%
Источник: Geek 4 You
IT→RUКлассический обзор, онлайн, средн. длины, Дата: 10 March 2022
Рейтинг: Итого: 85%
Test du Crosscall Action-X5 : des faiblesses qui nuisent (vraiment) à l'expérience
Источник: CNet France
FR→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 18 December 2021
Рейтинг: Итого: 60%
Источник: CNet France
FR→RU Archive.org versionКлассический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 18 December 2021
Рейтинг: Итого: 60%
Test Crosscall Action-X5 : très solide à l'extérieur, un peu moins à l'intérieur
Источник: Les Numeriques FR→RU Archive.org version
Классический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 18 December 2021
Рейтинг: Итого: 60% Производительность: 60% Качество экрана: 60% Портативность: 80% Внешний вид: 60% Эргономичность: 60%
Источник: Les Numeriques
FR→RU Archive.org versionКлассический обзор, онлайн, больш. длины, Дата: 18 December 2021
Рейтинг: Итого: 60% Производительность: 60% Качество экрана: 60% Портативность: 80% Внешний вид: 60% Эргономичность: 60%
Комментарий
Crosscall:
Графические процессоры этой категории производительности практически не подходят дли игр, но справятся с самыми простыми делами, вроде отображения 2D-материала на экране умеренного разрешения.
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Мобильная ARM графика, встроена в чипсете Snapdragon 665.
>> Больше сведений: Большой рейтинг видеокарт.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
SD 662: Производительный ARM чипсет среднего уровня с восьмиядерным процессором и достаточно медленной графикой Adreno 610
>> Больше сведений: Большой рейтинг процессоров.
>> Больше сведений: Рейтинг ноутбуков по качеству дисплея.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
73.75%: Плохой товар. Не рекомендуется к приобретению без самой крайней необходимости!
Вся информация - в наших подробных обзорах.
